Chapter 11 Demographic theory and COVID-19
11.1 Outline
- Formal demography of epidemic mortality
Additional resources:
- For more details and insights refer to Goldstein and Lee (2020)
11.2 Motivating questions
- How does age-structure of population affect epidemic mortality?
- How does mortality change affect life expectancy in normal times?
- How much remaining life is lost from an epidemic?
11.3 Population aging
Source: Tuljapurkar and Zuo
- Covid19 has affected the elderly the most which accounts for a substantial share of the population of the Global North.
11.3.1 Stable theory
Let’s revist the stable population theory to understand a change the importance of population structure on epidemic dynamics. The underlying assumptions to a stable population are that i) age-specific mortality and fertility rates are fixed over a long period, ii) age-structure is constant and iii) population closed to migration.
In this context, the population of age \(x\) in year \(t\) depends on the births (\(B(t)\)) and the survivorship: \[N(x,t)= B(t-x)\ell(x) =B(t)e^{-rx}\ell(x)\].
The total population in year \(t\) is then \(N(t)=\int_{0}^{x} N(a,t)da = B(t)\int_{0}^{x} e^{-ra}\ell(a)da\)
Proportion of stable population at age x: \[ c(x) = \frac{N(x,t)}{N(t)}=\frac{B(t)e^{-rx}\ell(x)}{N(t)} =b e^{-rx}\ell(x) \] where \(b\) is the birth rate \(\left(b=\frac{B(t)}{N(t)}\right)\). Note that the age-structure and the birth rate are independent of \(t\) in the notation.
Birth rate of a stable population: As \(\int_0^{x} c(a)da =1\), \[\int_{0}^{x} b e^{-ra}\ell(a)da =1 \\ b = \frac{1}{\int_{0}^{x} e^{-ra}\ell(a)da} \] Using the Lotka-Euler equation we find that: \[ \]
Now we look at the crude death rate (CDR), which is the share of deaths \(D(t)\) in a given population $$
\[\begin{aligned} CDR &= \frac{D(t)}{N(t)}\\ & = \frac{\int_{0}^{x} D(a,t)da}{\int_{0}^{x} N(a,t)da} \\ & = \frac{\int_{0}^{x} h(a) N(a,t)da}{B(t)\int_{0}^{x} e^{-ra}\ell(a)da} \\ &= \frac{B(t)\int_{0}^{x} h(a) e^{-ra}\ell(a)da}{B(t)\int_{0}^{x} e^{-ra}\ell(a)da} \end{aligned}\]$$ where \(h(x)\) is the hazard of dying at age \(x\).
Therefore, in a stable population with growth rate \(r\) we have a crude death rate that depends on the intrinsic growth rate: \[CDR(r) = {\int e^{-ra} \ell(a) h(a) \, da \over \int e^{-ra} \ell(a) \, da} \]
How does the CDR vary with growth rates?
We can change \(r=b-d\) to make the population younger or older: \(r>0 \Rightarrow\) younger population as \(b>d\) but if \(r<0 \Rightarrow\) then the population is older \[ \begin{aligned} \frac{d}{dr} \log CDR(r) &= \frac{d }{dr}\log \int e^{-ra} \ell(a) h(a) da - \frac{d}{dr}\log \int e^{-ra} \ell(a)da\\ & = -\frac{\int a e^{-ra} \ell(a) h(a) da}{\int e^{-ra} \ell(a) h(a) da} + \frac{\int a e^{-ra} \ell(a) da}{\int e^{-ra} \ell(a) da} \\ \end{aligned}\]
If we assume a stationary population, such that \(r=0\), \[ \begin{aligned} \frac{d}{dr} \log CDR(r) & = -\frac{\int a \ell(a) h(a) da}{\int \ell(a) h(a) da} + \frac{\int a \ell(a) da}{\int \ell(a) da} \\ & =-\frac{\int a D(a) da}{\int D(a) da} + \frac{\int a \ell(a) da}{\int \ell(a) da} \\ & = -\int a D(a) da + \frac{\int a \ell(a) da}{\int \ell(a) da} \end{aligned} \] Here, \(l(x)h(x)\) is the density of deaths by age \(x\) and \(\int_0^x D(a)da =1\). This is a classic result (from Lotka) where the rate at which \(r\) changes affects the CDR through the mean age (\(A\)) and the life expectancy at birth (\(e_0\)): \[{d \log CDR(r) \over dr}|_{r = 0} = A - e(0)\]An example: Let \(A=40\) and \(e_0=80\) then \({d \log CDR(r) \over dr}|_{r = 0}\approx -40\) If US and India had same age-specific mortality, but India grew 1 percent faster, what would the ratio of their crude death rates be? Both countries experience the same CDR(r) but for India \(dr=0.01\): \(d \log CDR(r) = (-40)(0.01) = -0.4\) The death rate will be 40% lower in the US relative to India conditional on age structure NOTE FOR JOSH: Not sure of interpretation of this example.
Now, if Covid-19 increases hazards at all ages by the same amount proportion in both countries, what will the ratio of their crude death rates be? 4 deaths in India per 10 deaths in the US.
11.4 Keyfitz’s entropy
Assume that there is a proportional difference in mortality rates across all ages such that: \[\mu^*(x) = (1 + \Delta) \mu_0(x)\] where \(\delta \in (0,1]\).
- The new survivoship is:
\[ \begin{aligned} \ell^*(x) &= e^{-\int_0^{x}\mu^{*}(a)da}\\ & = e^{-(1+\Delta)\int_0^{x}\mu(a)da} \\ & =\ell(x)^{1+ \Delta} \end{aligned}\]
- So, \(H^*(x) = (1 + \Delta) H(x)\).
- Life expectancy at birth is:
\[e_0^{*} (x) = \int_{0}^x \ell(a)^{1+\Delta}da\]
- How does the new life expectancy change with the increase in mortality at al ages?
\[ \frac{de_0^{*} (x)}{d\Delta} = \int_{0}^x (\log\ell(a))\ell(a)^{1+\Delta}da\] This quantity will never be positive, as \(\ell(a) \leq 1\) such that \(\log(\ell(a))<0\). As the \(\Delta\) factor increases, life expectancy at birth falls.
- Entropy is defined as
\[ {\cal H} = {d \log e_{0}(0) \over d \Delta} = {-\int \ell(x) \log \ell(x) \, dx \over e_{0}(0)} \] Reverse order of integration to get \[ {\cal H} = {\int d(x) e(x) \, dx \over e_{0}(0)} \] NOTE TO JOSH: don’t really know what the last formula is supposed to convey.
11.5 Loss of person years remaining
Before epidemic the person year remaining (PYR): \[ PYR = \int N(x) e(x) \, dx \] After (‘’instant’’) epidemic \[ PYR = \int \left[ N(x) - D^*(x) \right] e(x) \, dx \] Proportion of person years lost \[ \int D^*(x) e(x) \,dx \over \int N(x) e(x)\, dx \]
11.6 Stationary theory
If
- \(\color{red}{\mbox {Stationarity}}\, N(x) \propto \ell(x)\)
- \(\color{red}{\mbox {Proportional hazards}}\, M^*(x) = (1 + \Delta) M(x)\)
Then Proportional loss of person years: \[ \color{red}{ {-d \log PYR \over d \Delta} = {H \over A} = {\mbox{Life table entropy} \over \mbox{Mean age of stationary pop}}} \approx {0.15 \over 40} = 0.0038 \]
A doubling of mortality in epidemic year (\(\Delta = 1)\) causes ``only’’ a 0.38% loss of remaining life expectancy. % Average person who dies loses \(e^\dagger \approx 12\) years.
These numbers seem small, but:
- Even an epidemic doubling mortality has small effect on
remaining life expectancy (\(\approx \color{red}{2 \mbox{ months}}\) per person)
- But all-cause mortality also small (\(\approx \color{red}{2 \mbox{ months}}\) per person)
- Covid-19: 1 million deaths \(= 30\)% more mortality, but older \ (\(\approx \color{red}{2 \mbox{ weeks}}\) per person)
Barbi, Elisabetta, Francesco Lagona, Marco Marsili, James W Vaupel, and Kenneth W Wachter. 2018. “The Plateau of Human Mortality: Demography of Longevity Pioneers.” Science 360 (6396): 1459–61.
Batini, Chiara, Pille Hallast, Åshild J Vågene, Daniel Zadik, Heidi A Eriksen, Horolma Pamjav, Antti Sajantila, Jon H Wetton, and Mark A Jobling. 2017. “Population Resequencing of European Mitochondrial Genomes Highlights Sex-Bias in Bronze Age Demographic Expansions.” Scientific Reports 7 (1): 1–8.
Bongaarts, John, and Griffith Feeney. 1998. “On the Quantum and Tempo of Fertility.” Population and Development Review, 271–91.
Burkimsher, Marion. 2017. “Evolution of the Shape of the Fertility Curve: Why Might Some Countries Develop a Bimodal Curve?” Demographic Research 37: 295–324.
Coale, Ansley J, and Ellen Eliason Kisker. 1986. “Mortality Crossovers: Reality or Bad Data?” Population Studies 40 (3): 389–401.
Felsenstein, Joseph. 2005. “Theoretical Evolutionary Genetics Joseph Felsenstein.” University of Washington, Seattle. https://evolution.gs.washington.edu/gs562/2017/pgbook.pdf.
Goldstein, Joshua R, and Ronald D Lee. 2020. “Demographic Perspectives on Mortality of Covid-19 and Other Epidemics.” National Bureau of Economic Research.
Hahn, Matthew W, and R Alexander Bentley. 2003. “Drift as a Mechanism for Cultural Change: An Example from Baby Names.” Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences 270 (suppl_1): S120–S123.
Harris, Theodore Edward. 1964. “The Theory of Branching Process.” https://www.rand.org/content/dam/rand/pubs/reports/ 2009/R381.pdf.
Hastie, Trevor, Robert Tibshirani, and Jerome Friedman. 2009. The Elements of Statistical Learning: Data Mining, Inference, and Prediction. Springer Science & Business Media.
Horiuchi, Shiro. 2003. “Interspecies Differences in the Life Span Distribution: Humans Versus Invertebrates.” Population and Development Review 29: 127–51.
“Introduction to Probability.” 2006. https://math.dartmouth.edu/~prob/prob/prob.pdf.
Manton, Kenneth G, and Eric Stallard. 1981. “Methods for Evaluating the Heterogeneity of Aging Processes in Human Populations Using Vital Statistics Data: Explaining the Black/White Mortality Crossover by a Model of Mortality Selection.” Human Biology, 47–67.
Rodriguez, Germán. 2001. “Unobserved Heterogeneity.” https://data.princeton.edu/pop509/UnobservedHeterogeneity.pdf.
Steinsaltz, David R, and Kenneth W Wachter. 2006. “Understanding Mortality Rate Deceleration and Heterogeneity.” Mathematical Population Studies 13 (1): 19–37.
Sullivan, Rachel. 2005. “The Age Pattern of First-Birth Rates Among Us Women: The Bimodal 1990s.” Demography 42 (2): 259–73.
Vaupel, James W, Kenneth G Manton, and Eric Stallard. 1979. “The Impact of Heterogeneity in Individual Frailty on the Dynamics of Mortality.” Demography 16 (3): 439–54.
Vaupel, James W, and Trifon I Missov. 2014. “Unobserved Population Heterogeneity: A Review of Formal Relationships.” Demographic Research 31: 659–86. https://www.demographic-research.org/Volumes/Vol31/22/.
Wachter, Kenneth W. 2014. Essential Demographic Methods. Harvard University Press.
Waldron, Hilary. 2007. “Trends in Mortality Differentials and Life Expectancy for Male Social Security-Covered Workers, by Socioeconomic Status.” Soc. Sec. Bull. 67: 1.
References
Goldstein, Joshua R, and Ronald D Lee. 2020. “Demographic Perspectives on Mortality of Covid-19 and Other Epidemics.” National Bureau of Economic Research.